News about US Election Frauds, Collusion and Other Shenanigans to get Hillary Clinton Elected
By courtesy of Jean Hudon
This compilation will be of keen interest to those who closely follow the primaries in the US and the upcoming presidential elections...
As a complement to the material sent to me by Dan Stafford (further below), check also...
Why Many Bernie Sanders Supporters Will Soon be Abandoning the Democratic Party - And Why Their Super-Delegates Will Some Day Regret Sabotaging His Candidacy
(...) Is Donald Trump, who spent most of the past few decades as a Democrat and personal friend to the Clinton family, trying to drive the Republican party into a ditch? Simple logic would suggest he is not - a Trump presidential campaign that goes down in flames would put him in a place of deep dislike among much of the American people, and the effect on his brand, businesses, and celebrity would be bad enough for him personally that he probably would never attempt such an elaborate scheme, even to help his closest friends. But as George Will pointed out, it matters little what Trump's original intention was. His campaign is turning into exactly the kind that someone would run if they wanted to deliberately hand the election to the Democrats. Trump has already gone out of his way to offend several important groups - women, a war hero, the mighty media, Mexicans, and again, Mexicans.
Of course, this is all by design to ensure Hillary Clinton will win by a landslide and have a free rein to impose her will on the US and and much of the world and further the Illuminati's agenda discussed last weekend at the Bilderberg's meeting in Germany. (see Bilderberg Chooses Hillary Clinton for 2016?) BUT!!!...
Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, claimed on Sunday that he is preparing to release another slate of emails recovered from Hillary Clinton's private server that could possibly provide enough evidence for her indictment. (...) Assange also called Clinton a "liberal war hawk," citing emails in which she advocated for overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. "They predicted that the postwar outcome would be something like it is Š she has a long history of being a liberal war hawk," Assange said.Assange believes that Clinton is starting to feel the pressure from organizations like Wikileaks who have demanded her to be more transparent. "She has pushed for the prosecution of Wikileaks," Assange noted about Clinton. "We do see her as a bit of problem for freedom of the press more generally."
Julian Assange Knows FBI Won't Indict Hillary, Will Seek Concessions From Her Administration (14 Jun 2016)
Julian Assange: Next Leak of Hillary Clinton Emails Will Be Enough to Indict Her, but... (doubts the FBI will do so... in his opinion, the FBI would choose not to indict her in hopes of gaining favor with a Clinton administration.)
POTUS delays critical email release to protect Entitled Establishment Darling ... Despite his repeated claims of not influencing the Department of Justice and FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server scandal, Obama has helped shield her throughout the fiasco. The White House has protected Clinton's emails with the most potential to incriminate or impugn Clinton's self-portrayed public image.
* * * * * *
The following material has been sent to me by Dan Stafford <aquarianm@gmail.com>
Stanford University Confirms Democratic Election Fraud (June 16, 2016)
A bombshell study released by Stanford University confirms evidence of election fraud during the 2016 Democratic Party primaries. According to a paper released this week entitled, "Are we witnessing a dishonest election?," a state comparison based on the voting procedures used during the election reveals endemic election fraud within the system. Given the stakes in the outcome of the American presidential elections, ensuring the integrity of the electoral process is of the utmost importance. Are the results we are witnessing in the 2016 primary elections trustworthy? While Donald Trump enjoyed a clear and early edge over his Republican rivals, the Democratic contest between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernard Sanders has been far more competitive. At present, Secretary Clinton enjoys an apparent advantage over Sanders. Is this claimed advantage legitimate? We contend that it is not, and suggest an explanation for the advantage: States that are at risk for election fraud in 2016 systematically and overwhelmingly favor Secretary Clinton. We provide converging evidence for this claim. First, we show that it is possible to detect irregularities in the 2016 Democratic Primaries by comparing the states that have hard paper evidence of all the placed votes to states that do not have this hard paper evidence. Second, we compare the final results in 2016 to the discrepant exit polls. Furthermore, we show that no such irregularities occurred in the 2008 competitive election cycle involving Secretary Clinton against President Obama. As such, we find that in states wherein voting fraud has the highest potential to occur, systematic efforts may have taken place to provide Secretary Clinton with an exaggerated margin of support. CLIP
EXPOSED: Leaked Emails Show DNC Colluded with Media to Push Clinton Nomination - Occupy Liberals (June 16, 2016)
Despite claims of neutrality, recently leaked emails show the Democratic National Committee was putting its thumb on the scale for Hillary Clinton for over a year. When it was revealed that "Guccifer 2.0" (named after Romanian hacker Guccifer, who confessed to hacking into Hillary Clinton's private email server multiple times) hacked the DNC's servers, the main story was about leaked opposition research on Donald Trump. But on the same site Guccifer published the Trump research, "2016 GOP presidential candidates," there were also DNC talking points suggesting the party's central organization had been working since May of 2015 to make Hillary Clinton the nominee. CLIP - Check also Guccifer 2.0 claims responsibility for cyber attack on Democrats
Could California Flip for Bernie Sanders? (June 15, 2016)
Nearly 2 Million Votes Are Still Uncounted - Bernie Supporters Are Gathering Volunteers to Help Count the Remaining Ballots - Concern about Election Fraud in California and Other States Is Growing
2.5 Million Untallied Votes in CA, Mass Voter Purge in OH, and Other Stuff That Still Matters (6/10/2016)
On today's BradCast, while the Democratic Party and the mainstream corporate media may have moved on --- and Elizabeth Warren may feel ready to be Commander-in-Chief if tapped as Vice President --- there are millions of still-untallied ballots in the state of California. Meanwhile, in the key Presidential swing-state of Ohio, Democrats are being disproportionately purged from the voting rolls by state Republicans in advance of the 2016 general election. Yes, democracy actually still matters, and that includes counting the ballots of all the legal voters who wish to vote, counting them accurately, and in a way that we can know they have been counted accurately. While we've been reporting this week, often exclusively, on the huge number of still untallied ballots --- both Provisional and Vote-by-Mail ballots --- here in Los Angeles County, ever since Tuesday's Presidential Primary, new data now reveals the totals are even higher than we've so far reported, both in L.A. and across the state. With some 3.5 million ballots now tallied in the Democratic Primary, and a 500,000 vote (appx. 13%) margin for Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders, there are still some 2.5 million ballots that have yet to be tallied at all. We discuss what that means and why it matters on today's program. CLIP
Judge confirms 'criminal investigation' into Clinton emails (June 14, 2016)
The FBI is conducting a high-stakes "criminal investigation" into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's email practices, a federal judge confirmed Tuesday in a memo that said her tech guru can keep his immunity agreement Emmet G. Sullivan, who has now reviewed the immunity agreement between Bryan Pagliano and the Justice Department, said the document should remain sealed "because the government's criminal investigation through which Mr. Pagliano received limited immunity is ongoing and confidential." PROMOTED CONTENTRecommended by Mr. Pagliano, who set up and maintained the secret server Mrs. Clinton used to conduct government business, has agreed to cooperate with the FBI in its probe in exchange for being shielded from prosecution. But Judge Sullivan has ordered Mr. Pagliano testify as part of an open-records lawsuit trying to figure out why the State Department struggled to preserve and released Mrs. Clinton's emails, which were official records supposed to be stored under federal law. Mr. Pagliano has indicated he will refuse to answer any questions, asserting his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. He and his lawyers had asked that the deposition not be videotaped, fearing it could be used eventually in political attacks against Mrs. Clinton. Judge Sullivan, though, rejected that, saying the session with Judicial Watch, the group that's pursuing the open-records lawsuit, can be taped. But the video will be sealed until the judge decides later what to do with it. "Mr. Pagliano is an important witness and we're pleased his testimony will be videotaped," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.
The Math of the Convention - National Convention: The Math, as it stands on June 15, 2016 https://johnlaurits.com/2016/06/15/the-math-of-the-convention/
(...) 29 States Haven't Certified Their Results &16 State Conventions Remain (...) Something to Keep in MindŠRemember: now that all of the 4,051 pledged delegates are "accounted for" (they shouldn't be, but that's another issueŠ), every delegate that we gain - whether from state conventions, from recounts, from updated California results, or from whatever else - each delegate is taken from $hillary's total and added to Bernie Sanders' total. In other words, while there are 385 delegates between C/inton & Sanders, we only need half of that number to catch up - make sense? We don't need to gain 385 delegates - we only need to gain 193 delegates to take the lead. ... The bottom line is this: as a movement, we are going to try to grab those 193 delegates in any way that we can - that may seem like a really difficult thing to do & that's because it pretty much is. It is not impossible, however. There is a good amount of time between now & the convention - a lot of things could happen in that time & we're going to have to use it well, if our social revolution is to succeed! CLIP
Trust Vote
(...) IMPORTANT NOTE: Although we have taken note of the shift here from Sanders to Clinton, we are NOT in any way stating who has done the shifting. WE DO NOT KNOW WHO HAS DONE THE SHIFTING OF THE ELECTRONIC VOTE TOTALS. This situation has galvanized three organizations, The Institute for American Democracy and Election Integrity (ADE) , the Columbus Institute of Contemporary Journalism, and Democracy Counts to set up our own exit polls and audits to track apparent election results in California. Richard Charnin, a mathematician and statistician and author of the book, Matrix of Deceit, has been reporting on the apparent shifting of electronic vote totals and the non-release of raw data from Edison since 2004. Richard Charnin, well-known for what he calls the "Red Shift" which has been a shift between exit polls and electronic vote total differences of about 4-5% each year. This constitutes a shift to the political right.
(...) As computer security expert Stephen Spoonamore notes in the video above, when exit poll data varies more than 2% from electronic vote totals, the electronic vote totals are questionnable. If fact, 2% is used as the boundary by the US government when determining that the election in another country other than the US has possibly been stolen. Please note the exit poll differences up above that are more than 2%. These differences point to questionable results for the electronic vote totals. For whatever reason, the Media Consortium and Edison Research have decided to cancel the exit polls for the remaining 2016 primaries. Some suspect these exit polls have been canceled because these exit poll differences have become suspect. Others believe it is because the Media Consortium has viewed these primaries as unimportant with respect to the final results of the primaries for the presidential candidates. Thus the remaining primary elections will not have the larger exit polls to reflect on the accuracy of the electronic vote totals.
Check also....
Election Justice USA affirmed that a Capitol Weekly early-voter exit poll conducted across the state of California yielded a 23 percent discrepancy in Los Angeles vote-by-mail ballots compared to the actual results. During the polling of the early round of mail-in voters, Hillary Clinton had a lead over Bernie Sanders in the Los Angeles area that was less than 10 percent. Election Justice USA, a voter advocacy non-profit organization, says that the discrepancy is enough to demand a hand audit of the early mail-in ballots. "The discrepancy cannot be easily explained by demographic factors: the results of the Capitol Weekly exit poll were weighted by age and race. Moreover, the exit poll had 21,000 respondents and was praised by mainstream elections journalists.While no exit poll can prove fraud, a significant exit polling discrepancy such as this constitutes cause for alarm, and certainly one of this magnitude. It's also sufficient cause for immediate action: voters should bring pressure to bear on officials and demand an expanded hand audit." CLIP
Media Coverage of the Primaries Was Awful, Harvard Study Confirms (June 14, 2016)
A recently released Harvard study is accusing major print and broadcast media of improperly influencing the presidential primaries in the months leading up to the first contests.
Inspired By Bernie, 'Sanders Democrats' Are Winning Primary Elections
http://www.inquisitr.com/3208429/inspired-by-bernie-sanders-democrats-are-winning-primary-elections/
It looks like the sleeping giant is finally awakening. Throughout the nation, Sanders Democrats, A.K.A. "Berniecrats," are winning local and statewide elections. Throughout his campaign, Sanders has called for a political revolution, the kind of revolution that inspires people to run for office and inspires others to vote for them.